High-Gravity Judicial Watch Court Settlement Strips CA Of Estimated 1.5M Inactive Voters
You have to hand it to Judicial Watch and their President, Tom Fitton. They went up against the State of California and the County of Los Angeles for ridding their voter registration rolls of INACTIVE voters including dead voters…and they WON.
Judicial Watch deserves a long victory lap after reaching a settlement with California to remove 1.5 million ‘inactive registrations’ from their rolls.
“The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting.” – Bukowski
This is a HUGE victory for every American Patriot. If you felt shock the first time you heard California was open to illegal voters then this is a major win.
It is also a win to American’s who felt disbelief when they heard former President Obama openly encourage non-citizens to vote. The video is below if you would like to be shocked again.
Thursday, in a Judicial Watch Press Release, it was announced a settlement agreement was signed requiring California to remove “from their voter registration rolls as many as 1.5 million inactive registered names that may be invalid. These removals are required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).”
After discovering that “Los Angeles County has a registration rate of 112 percent of its adult citizen population,” and “the entire State of California has a registration rate of about 101 percent of its age-eligible citizenry,” JW stepped up and did something about it.
But but but…the Democrats say that Voter ID laws suppress voter turnout.
Investor’s Business Daily begs to differ that laws on the books like the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) are there for a reason and “there’s no evidence that voter ID laws suppress turnout.”
“In fact, of 11 states that adopted strict voter ID laws, nine either saw increased turnout in 2016, or had turnout rates higher than the national average, the Heritage Foundation notes,” reported Investor’s Business Daily.
Furthermore, it was noted that “cleaning up registration rolls, aggressively pursuing voter fraud cases, using paper ballots” and “other measures to ensure the integrity of the ballot” does not “suppress legitimate voters.”